Toeti Heraty (2001)
The Via Dolorosa
Toeti Heraty
Two books are lying on the table. The third book is on the
making about the sculptur Dolorosa Sinaga and her works of art. How these twpo
other books relate to Dolorosa? The one is a thriller, a New York best seller,
the other is a four-teen-year compilation of trans Atlantic love letters.
A serial killer who leaves his victims – women raped and
strangled – for the medical examiner, a women who is using the latest advances
in forensic research and almost became a victim too. Dolorosa is in a way
killer too. Forms alive with imaginationalive into dead bodies in whatever
material, bronze or copper. But to be able to analyze a corpse and then create
identity and intent of the killer. Dolorosa is like the forensic researcher.
She becomes simultaneously killer and examiner. Killing the resistance of the
material to change its substance to become significant form.
The love letters are written by Simone de Beauvoir to Nelson
Algren, an American writer almost forgotten except for his scenario for a film
with Frank Sinatra “The Man With the Golden Arm”. Simone appearingvery loving,
very passionate persuading him to visit her Parisian Intellectual life
with Jean-Paul Sarte, Albert Camus and
Arthur Koestler.
Was it possible to share a world of intimacy but to remain
apart maintaining a “trans Atlantic amour”? The letters are written in period
of fourteen years time but the bodies are staying apart, Simone in Paris,
Nelson in Chicago. In her letters she refers to embraces, lips, hands, arms and
the “rest”.
Dolorosa would become impatient looking for a body, while
tracing the kaleidoscope of emotions through three hundred and four letters.
Creating bodies, emerging from primeval emotion and not the other way around,
especially Dolorosa would in vain look for the body.
Finally the trans Atlantic amour flounders because bodies are
far apart, ignoring the dictum of modern philosophy “I think, therefore I
exist” which id only good enough for philosopher. We, as lover exist through
our bodies we grow into the depth of emotion and are liberated through
recognition. Even for lovers the bodies have to be discovered while soul and
spirit are serious distractions, to pull attention away from the body.
It is paradoxical that finally women will create female
bodies which strange enough belonging to men’s territory of patriarchal
interpretation. It was patriarchy that keep female bodies within the boundaries
of the beauty myth, of virgin, purity, fertility, and the temptation of the
flesh: a female body is enemy territory to be occupied, penetrated, ploughed
for fertility and posterity sake. If finally women come to know and recreate
their own bodies it is a moment which has been awaited for a long long time,
while women’s knowledge of female bodies was formerly limited to knowledge
through abortion and midwifery.
Dolorosa’s fermale bodies emerge primarily through a
geography of emotion, grief, happiness, ecstasy and solidarity. Women existing
through bodily depiction keeping close to the earth roots are now trying to
soar away through movement of intent and imagination. Her sculpture became
substance to be reckoned with in a new metaphysics of freedom and recreation.
Instead of taken a rib out of Adam’s body, women’s existence is created within
wider horizons.
She has broken the long silence women now speaking for
themselves, through mute forms subduing silent materiality into significant,
that is what we owe to Dolo. A long painful and mute suffering the via Dolorosa
is now left behind: through Dolorosa’s art the I can speak.
Budapest, 6 September 2001
Komentar
Posting Komentar